Aleut vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Aleut
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Aleuts
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
56.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,771,544 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,692,358 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 15.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Aleut | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 32.1% |
| Range | 48.7% | 30.1% |
| Mean | 16.9% | 14.8% |
| Median | 12.0% | 13.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.1% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.3% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.2% | 5.4% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Aleuts by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), White/Caucasian (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Oceania (13.3%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Liberian (15.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Ottawa (15.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (15.4%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (15.4%, a difference of 0.53%), and Jamaican (15.5%, a difference of 0.61%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |