Ute vs Palestinian Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Ute
Palestinian
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Ute
Palestinians
28.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Palestinian Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,657,508 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.154 and weighted average of 28.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,372,515 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233 and weighted average of 28.1%, a difference of 0.27%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Palestinian |
| Minimum | 6.3% | 13.1% |
| Maximum | 73.7% | 57.1% |
| Range | 67.4% | 44.1% |
| Mean | 32.2% | 28.4% |
| Median | 28.7% | 27.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.5% | 24.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.3% | 31.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.9% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.6% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.3% | 7.6% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Palestinians by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Nicaragua (28.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Chilean (28.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Colombia (28.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Kenya (28.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from the Azores (28.1%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Sioux (28.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Choctaw (28.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (28.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Oceania (28.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from the Azores (28.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 28.3% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 99.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 99.4 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Chickasaw | 99.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Panamanians | 99.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 99.2 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.1 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Ute | 99.1 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Chileans | 98.9 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 98.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 98.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Indonesians | 98.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 98.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Palestinians | 98.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Sioux | 98.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Choctaw | 98.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Immigrants | South America | 98.0 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 97.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 97.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 97.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 28.0% |