Ute vs Chilean Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Ute
Chilean
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Ute
Chileans
28.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Chilean Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,657,508 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.154 and weighted average of 28.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,524,763 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.251 and weighted average of 28.1%, a difference of 0.060%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Chilean |
Minimum | 6.3% | 10.7% |
Maximum | 73.7% | 47.6% |
Range | 67.4% | 36.9% |
Mean | 32.2% | 27.1% |
Median | 28.7% | 28.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.5% | 22.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.3% | 30.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.9% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.6% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.3% | 7.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Chileans by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Nicaragua (28.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Colombia (28.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Kenya (28.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from the Azores (28.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Indonesian (28.1%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Kenya (28.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from the Azores (28.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Indonesian (28.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (28.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Oceania (28.1%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 99.6 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Colombians | 99.6 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Liberians | 99.6 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 99.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 99.4 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Chickasaw | 99.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Panamanians | 99.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 99.2 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.1 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Ute | 99.1 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Chileans | 98.9 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 98.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 98.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Indonesians | 98.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 98.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Palestinians | 98.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Sioux | 98.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Choctaw | 98.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | South America | 98.0 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 28.0% |