Panamanian vs Chilean Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Panamanian
Chilean
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Panamanians
Chileans
28.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
93rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Panamanian vs Chilean Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,035,493 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.401 and weighted average of 28.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,524,763 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.251 and weighted average of 28.1%, a difference of 0.20%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Panamanian | Chilean |
| Minimum | 4.6% | 10.7% |
| Maximum | 49.6% | 47.6% |
| Range | 45.0% | 36.9% |
| Mean | 24.4% | 27.1% |
| Median | 25.4% | 28.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 22.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.4% | 30.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.7% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.2% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.1% | 7.5% |
Demographics Similar to Panamanians and Chileans by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Immigrants from Colombia (28.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Chickasaw (28.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (28.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (28.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ute (28.2%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Kenya (28.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from the Azores (28.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Ute (28.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Indonesian (28.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Nicaragua (28.2%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Immigrants | Syria | 99.8 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 28.4% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 99.6 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 28.3% |
| Colombians | 99.6 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 28.3% |
| Liberians | 99.6 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 28.3% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 28.3% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 99.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 99.4 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Chickasaw | 99.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Panamanians | 99.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 99.2 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.1 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Ute | 99.1 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Chileans | 98.9 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 98.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 98.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Indonesians | 98.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 98.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Palestinians | 98.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Sioux | 98.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Choctaw | 98.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 28.1% |