South African vs Luxembourger Family Households
COMPARE
South African
Luxembourger
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
South Africans
Luxembourgers
63.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Luxembourger Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,542,946 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131 and weighted average of 63.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,654,456 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.495 and weighted average of 63.3%, a difference of 0.26%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South African | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 40.0% | 41.4% |
| Maximum | 96.0% | 93.3% |
| Range | 56.0% | 51.9% |
| Mean | 68.7% | 67.9% |
| Median | 65.1% | 67.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.7% | 63.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 81.0% | 72.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.3% | 9.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.5% | 9.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and Luxembourgers by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Aleut (63.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Israel (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (63.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Potawatomi (63.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Icelander (63.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (63.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Slovak (63.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Bahamian (63.3%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
| South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 1.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 1.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 1.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 1.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Dominicans | 1.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Russians | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Taiwanese | 1.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Bahamians | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 1.0 /100 | #253 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Slovaks | 1.0 /100 | #254 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Potawatomi | 1.0 /100 | #255 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Luxembourgers | 0.9 /100 | #256 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Icelanders | 0.8 /100 | #257 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.7 /100 | #258 | Tragic 63.2% |