Comanche vs Luxembourger Family Households
COMPARE
Comanche
Luxembourger
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Comanche
Luxembourgers
63.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
2.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Luxembourger Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,767,909 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.713 and weighted average of 63.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,654,456 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.495 and weighted average of 63.3%, a difference of 0.29%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Comanche | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 47.4% | 41.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 93.3% |
Range | 52.6% | 51.9% |
Mean | 69.1% | 67.9% |
Median | 66.7% | 67.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.2% | 63.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.4% | 72.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.3% | 9.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 9.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Comanche and Luxembourgers by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Ghanaian (63.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (63.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Aleut (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (63.4%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Potawatomi (63.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (63.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Slovak (63.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Bahamian (63.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and Taiwanese (63.3%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Ghanaians | 2.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 63.5% |
Comanche | 2.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 63.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 1.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 1.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 1.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 1.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 63.4% |
Dominicans | 1.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 63.4% |
Russians | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 63.4% |
Taiwanese | 1.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 63.3% |
Bahamians | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 63.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 1.0 /100 | #253 | Tragic 63.3% |
Slovaks | 1.0 /100 | #254 | Tragic 63.3% |
Potawatomi | 1.0 /100 | #255 | Tragic 63.3% |
Luxembourgers | 0.9 /100 | #256 | Tragic 63.3% |