Pueblo vs Subsaharan African Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Pueblo
Subsaharan African
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Pueblo
Sub-Saharan Africans
25.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
67.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pueblo vs Subsaharan African Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,047,351 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pueblo and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015 and weighted average of 25.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,337,784 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 27.6%, a difference of 9.3%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pueblo | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 3.8% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 43.8% | 58.3% |
Range | 40.0% | 55.4% |
Mean | 23.0% | 29.4% |
Median | 22.5% | 28.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.8% | 25.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.5% | 31.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.7% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 11.0% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households with Children
Demographics Similar to Pueblo by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Pueblo are Hopi (25.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Grenada (25.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Carpatho Rusyn (25.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Alsatian (25.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Serbia (25.5%, a difference of 0.94%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 25.7% |
Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.7% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.6% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 25.6% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 25.6% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 25.5% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 25.3% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 25.2% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 25.2% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 25.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 25.2% |
Soviet Union | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 24.8% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (27.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Romanian (27.6%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 27.6% |
Icelanders | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 27.6% |
Comanche | 74.8 /100 | #155 | Good 27.6% |
Hungarians | 74.6 /100 | #156 | Good 27.6% |
Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |