Native/Alaskan vs Japanese Family Households
COMPARE
Native/Alaskan
Japanese
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Natives/Alaskans
Japanese
66.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native/Alaskan vs Japanese Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,654,863 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.574 and weighted average of 66.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,074,128 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 0.70%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Native/Alaskan | Japanese |
| Minimum | 49.9% | 39.1% |
| Maximum | 90.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 40.1% | 60.9% |
| Mean | 68.3% | 66.2% |
| Median | 67.2% | 66.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.2% | 60.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.1% | 72.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 12.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans and Japanese by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Navajo (66.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (66.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Colombian (66.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Afghan (66.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Colombia (66.3%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Costa Rican (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Pima (65.9%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Navajo | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Colombians | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |