Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Pima Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Pima
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Pima
66.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Pima Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,677,474 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 66.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,539,566 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 0.72%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Pima |
Minimum | 37.9% | 40.4% |
Maximum | 97.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 59.0% | 59.6% |
Mean | 70.8% | 69.9% |
Median | 69.8% | 68.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.3% | 63.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.5% | 76.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.2% | 13.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 12.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 11.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia and Pima by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Immigrants from Venezuela (66.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Bolivian (66.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Navajo (66.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Native/Alaskan (66.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Arapaho (66.5%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Costa Rican (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Indonesia (66.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Central American (66.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Danish (66.0%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 66.5% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 66.5% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 66.4% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 66.4% |
Navajo | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 66.4% |
Natives/Alaskans | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 66.4% |
Colombians | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |