Chinese vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Married-couple Households

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128 and weighted average of 50.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,710,717 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.445 and weighted average of 40.9%, a difference of 23.3%.

In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Pennsylvania German (50.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Pakistan (50.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (50.6%, a difference of 0.55%), Swiss (49.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Korea (49.9%, a difference of 0.98%).

In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Jamaican (40.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Haiti (40.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Caribbean (40.8%, a difference of 0.18%), African (40.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Colville (41.0%, a difference of 0.30%).