Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Married-couple Households

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,654,857 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.292 and weighted average of 41.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,710,717 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.445 and weighted average of 40.9%, a difference of 2.3%.

Married-couple Households Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Middle Africa	Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Minimum	34.6%	24.5%
Maximum	62.9%	92.8%
Range	28.4%	68.3%
Mean	42.8%	44.6%
Median	41.6%	43.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	38.3%	34.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	45.6%	48.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.4%	13.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.2%	14.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.1%	14.2%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa and Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Married-couple Households

In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Arapaho (41.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ghana (41.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Belize (41.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bahamas (41.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Sudan (41.9%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Jamaican (40.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Haiti (40.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Caribbean (40.8%, a difference of 0.18%), African (40.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Colville (41.0%, a difference of 0.30%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-couple Households
Immigrants \| Sudan	0.0 /100 \| #296	Tragic 41.9%
Arapaho	0.0 /100 \| #297	Tragic 41.8%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	0.0 /100 \| #298	Tragic 41.8%
Immigrants \| Ghana	0.0 /100 \| #299	Tragic 41.8%
Immigrants \| Belize	0.0 /100 \| #300	Tragic 41.8%
Immigrants \| Bahamas	0.0 /100 \| #301	Tragic 41.7%
Immigrants \| Honduras	0.0 /100 \| #302	Tragic 41.6%
Sub-Saharan Africans	0.0 /100 \| #303	Tragic 41.6%
Immigrants \| Guyana	0.0 /100 \| #304	Tragic 41.6%
Sioux	0.0 /100 \| #305	Tragic 41.5%
Guyanese	0.0 /100 \| #306	Tragic 41.4%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	0.0 /100 \| #307	Tragic 41.4%
Crow	0.0 /100 \| #308	Tragic 41.4%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.0 /100 \| #309	Tragic 41.2%
Haitians	0.0 /100 \| #310	Tragic 41.2%
Colville	0.0 /100 \| #311	Tragic 41.0%
Africans	0.0 /100 \| #312	Tragic 40.9%
Immigrants \| Haiti	0.0 /100 \| #313	Tragic 40.9%
Jamaicans	0.0 /100 \| #314	Tragic 40.9%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.0 /100 \| #315	Tragic 40.9%
Immigrants \| Caribbean	0.0 /100 \| #316	Tragic 40.8%