Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Oceania Currently Married
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Immigrants from Oceania
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Immigrants from Oceania
44.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
235th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
44.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Oceania Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,820,219 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.637 and weighted average of 44.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,491,409 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.259 and weighted average of 46.5%, a difference of 4.2%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 9.6% | 16.2% |
Maximum | 82.4% | 91.9% |
Range | 72.8% | 75.7% |
Mean | 40.6% | 44.8% |
Median | 41.9% | 46.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 27.7% | 40.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 49.9% | 48.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.2% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.7% | 13.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.6% | 13.5% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Cuban (44.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Seminole (44.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Moroccan (44.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (44.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Iroquois (44.7%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 45.0% |
Cree | 1.7 /100 | #229 | Tragic 44.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 1.6 /100 | #230 | Tragic 44.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 1.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 44.9% |
Nepalese | 1.2 /100 | #232 | Tragic 44.7% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 44.7% |
Iroquois | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 44.7% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 44.6% |
Cubans | 0.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 44.6% |
Seminole | 0.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 44.6% |
Moroccans | 0.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 44.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 44.5% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 44.5% |
Ethiopians | 0.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 44.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 44.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Costa Rican (46.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Ottawa (46.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Potawatomi (46.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Chickasaw (46.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |
Immigrants | Chile | 36.8 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.4% |