Zimbabwean vs Soviet Union Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Soviet Union
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Soviet Union
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Soviet Union Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,200,821 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,504,651 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.185 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.2%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Soviet Union |
| Minimum | 0.53% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 6.9% | 6.1% |
| Range | 6.4% | 5.1% |
| Mean | 3.0% | 3.2% |
| Median | 2.9% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.0% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Soviet Union by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants (2.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Jordanian (2.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Syria (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |