Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Immigrants from Costa Rica
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,200,821 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,259,714 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.124 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.3%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Costa Rica |
| Minimum | 0.53% | 0.86% |
| Maximum | 6.9% | 6.8% |
| Range | 6.4% | 6.0% |
| Mean | 3.0% | 3.2% |
| Median | 2.9% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Immigrants from Costa Rica by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Jordanian (2.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Liberian (2.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Zaire (2.9%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Syria (2.9%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |