Zimbabwean vs Iroquois Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Iroquois
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Iroquois
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
294th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Iroquois Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,200,821 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,234,174 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.708 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 30.2%.
![Zimbabwean vs Iroquois Hearing Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/hearing-disability/zimbabweans-vs-iroquois-hearing-disability-chart.webp)
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Iroquois |
Minimum | 0.53% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 6.9% | 40.9% |
Range | 6.4% | 38.9% |
Mean | 3.0% | 8.8% |
Median | 2.9% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 4.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 8.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants (2.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Jordanian (2.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Yemen | 92.7 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.8% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 92.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Welsh (3.7%, a difference of 0.27%), Native Hawaiian (3.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Finnish (3.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and White/Caucasian (3.7%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.7% |
Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% |
Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |
Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |
Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 3.7% |
Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 3.7% |
Germans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 3.7% |
Scottish | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 3.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 3.7% |