Swiss vs Iroquois Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Swiss
Iroquois
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Swiss
Iroquois
3.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
294th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Iroquois Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,835,494 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.206 and weighted average of 3.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,234,174 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.708 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 4.3%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Swiss | Iroquois |
Minimum | 0.50% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 25.0% | 40.9% |
Range | 24.5% | 38.9% |
Mean | 5.1% | 8.8% |
Median | 4.0% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 4.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.8% | 8.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 9.1% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Iroquois by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Czechoslovakian (3.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Danish (3.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Nonimmigrants (3.6%, a difference of 1.0%), Basque (3.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and Slovak (3.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Native Hawaiian (3.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Finnish (3.7%, a difference of 0.36%), White/Caucasian (3.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and Chinese (3.7%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Swiss | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 3.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 3.6% |
Danes | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 3.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 3.6% |
Basques | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 3.6% |
Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 3.6% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.6% |
Scandinavians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.6% |
Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.6% |
Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.7% |
Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% |
Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |
Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |