Spanish American Indian vs Chinese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Spanish American Indian
Chinese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Spanish American Indians
Chinese
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
250th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American Indian vs Chinese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,149,525 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,795,509 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 0.90%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish American Indian | Chinese |
Minimum | 2.4% | 0.26% |
Maximum | 22.6% | 17.0% |
Range | 20.2% | 16.8% |
Mean | 7.6% | 7.3% |
Median | 6.7% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.0% | 8.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians and Chinese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Bermudan (6.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (6.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Aleut (6.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Belize (6.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Welsh (6.5%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Native Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Portugal (6.5%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Cuba (6.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (6.5%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Panama | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 6.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 6.5% |
Armenians | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 6.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 6.5% |
Chinese | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 6.5% |
Hawaiians | 0.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.8 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.5% |
Scottish | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.5% |
Belizeans | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.5% |
Welsh | 0.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.6 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.5% |
Bermudans | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.5% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 6.5% |
Aleuts | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.4 /100 | #260 | Tragic 6.6% |
Irish | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 6.6% |
English | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 6.6% |
Hmong | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 6.6% |
Nepalese | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 6.6% |