Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Chinese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Chinese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Chinese
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
250th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Chinese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,275,583 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.777 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,795,509 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 20.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Saudi Arabia | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.94% | 0.26% |
Maximum | 16.3% | 17.0% |
Range | 15.4% | 16.8% |
Mean | 5.0% | 7.3% |
Median | 4.6% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.2% | 8.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 2.7% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia are Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Native Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Portugal (6.5%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Cuba (6.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (6.5%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Germans | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Panama | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 6.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 6.5% |
Armenians | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 6.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 6.5% |
Chinese | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 6.5% |
Hawaiians | 0.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.8 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.5% |
Scottish | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.5% |
Belizeans | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.5% |
Welsh | 0.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.6 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.5% |
Bermudans | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.5% |