Ecuadorian vs Chinese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Chinese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Ecuadorians
Chinese
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
60.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
250th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Chinese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,738,990 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.221 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,795,509 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 6.6%.
![Ecuadorian vs Chinese Ambulatory Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/ambulatory-disability/ecuadorians-vs-chinese-ambulatory-disability-chart.webp)
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ecuadorian | Chinese |
Minimum | 1.9% | 0.26% |
Maximum | 10.7% | 17.0% |
Range | 8.8% | 16.8% |
Mean | 5.6% | 7.3% |
Median | 5.7% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 8.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 2.7% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Oceania (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Nicaraguan (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Basque (6.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Native Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Portugal (6.5%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Cuba (6.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (6.5%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Germans | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Panama | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 6.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 6.5% |
Armenians | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 6.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 6.5% |
Chinese | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 6.5% |
Hawaiians | 0.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.8 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.5% |
Scottish | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.5% |
Belizeans | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.5% |
Welsh | 0.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.6 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.5% |
Bermudans | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.5% |