Soviet Union vs Crow Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Crow
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Soviet Union
Crow
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Crow Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,504,651 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.185 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,194,968 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Crow and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.217 and weighted average of 4.2%, a difference of 44.9%.
![Soviet Union vs Crow Hearing Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/hearing-disability/soviet-union-vs-crow-hearing-disability-chart.webp)
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Soviet Union | Crow |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.69% |
Maximum | 6.1% | 17.5% |
Range | 5.1% | 16.8% |
Mean | 3.2% | 5.7% |
Median | 3.0% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.9% | 6.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.0% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.0% | 3.9% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Crow by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Tohono O'odham (4.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Arapaho (4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Native/Alaskan (4.2%, a difference of 0.79%), Cherokee (4.2%, a difference of 0.94%), and Potawatomi (4.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 4.1% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 4.1% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 4.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 4.1% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 4.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 4.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |