Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Soviet Union
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
15.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,504,651 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.185 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,448,522 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.509 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 8.3%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Soviet Union | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.83% |
Maximum | 6.1% | 13.9% |
Range | 5.1% | 13.0% |
Mean | 3.2% | 4.7% |
Median | 3.0% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.9% | 5.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.0% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.0% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Alsatian (3.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Denmark (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Eastern European (3.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Thailand (3.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Hispanic or Latino (3.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 20.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 3.1% |
Syrians | 19.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |