Immigrants from Sudan vs Crow Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sudan
Crow
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Sudan
Crow
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
87.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sudan vs Crow Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,954,451 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.120 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,194,968 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Crow and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.217 and weighted average of 4.2%, a difference of 45.8%.
![Immigrants from Sudan vs Crow Hearing Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/hearing-disability/immigrants-from-sudan-vs-crow-hearing-disability-chart.webp)
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Sudan | Crow |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.69% |
Maximum | 8.5% | 17.5% |
Range | 7.5% | 16.8% |
Mean | 3.0% | 5.7% |
Median | 2.8% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.3% | 6.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 3.9% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sudan by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Immigrants from Albania (2.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Zaire (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Bahamian (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%), South American Indian (2.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Western Asia (2.9%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Crow by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Tohono O'odham (4.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Arapaho (4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Native/Alaskan (4.2%, a difference of 0.79%), Cherokee (4.2%, a difference of 0.94%), and Potawatomi (4.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 4.1% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 4.1% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 4.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 4.1% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 4.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 4.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |