New Zealander vs Alaskan Athabascan Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
New Zealander
Alaskan Athabascan
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
New Zealanders
Alaskan Athabascans
17.4%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
21.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.6%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
6.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Alaskan Athabascan Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,922,503 people shows no correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023 and weighted average of 17.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,820,962 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.007 and weighted average of 17.6%, a difference of 0.90%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | New Zealander | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 3.1% | 6.5% |
| Maximum | 37.6% | 33.7% |
| Range | 34.5% | 27.2% |
| Mean | 15.6% | 16.4% |
| Median | 15.4% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.2% | 19.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders and Alaskan Athabascans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Guyanese (17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Panama (17.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Singapore (17.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and Haitian (17.5%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Immigrants from El Salvador (17.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Hawaiian (17.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Oceania (17.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Taiwanese (17.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (17.6%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| New Zealanders | 21.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.4% |
| Guyanese | 17.5 /100 | #196 | Poor 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 16.7 /100 | #197 | Poor 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 14.8 /100 | #198 | Poor 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 14.3 /100 | #199 | Poor 17.5% |
| Haitians | 14.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 17.5% |
| South American Indians | 13.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 12.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 11.0 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 11.0 /100 | #204 | Poor 17.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 10.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 17.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 10.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 9.7 /100 | #207 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 9.3 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 8.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 8.5 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Taiwanese | 7.7 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 7.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Hawaiians | 7.2 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 7.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 6.9 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.6% |