Guatemalan vs Alaskan Athabascan Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Alaskan Athabascan
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Guatemalans
Alaskan Athabascans
17.8%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
2.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
231st/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.6%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
6.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs Alaskan Athabascan Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,490,798 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 17.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,820,962 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.007 and weighted average of 17.6%, a difference of 0.88%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guatemalan | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 7.9% | 6.5% |
Maximum | 36.1% | 33.7% |
Range | 28.2% | 27.2% |
Mean | 17.2% | 16.4% |
Median | 17.5% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.9% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.4% | 19.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans and Alaskan Athabascans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Tongan (17.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Panamanian (17.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Mongolian (17.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Guatemala (17.7%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Central America (17.7%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Immigrants from El Salvador (17.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Okinawan (17.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Salvadoran (17.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Hawaiian (17.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and Icelander (17.6%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Hawaiians | 7.2 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 7.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 6.9 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.6% |
Okinawans | 6.8 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.6% |
Salvadorans | 6.7 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.6% |
Icelanders | 6.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 6.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.6% |
Zimbabweans | 6.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 17.6% |
Moroccans | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 17.6% |
Central Americans | 4.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 17.7% |
Alsatians | 4.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 17.7% |
Fijians | 3.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 17.7% |
Vietnamese | 3.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 17.7% |
Marshallese | 2.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 2.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Central America | 2.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 2.2 /100 | #229 | Tragic 17.7% |
Mongolians | 2.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 17.7% |
Guatemalans | 2.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 17.8% |
Tongans | 2.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 17.8% |
Panamanians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 17.8% |