Immigrants from Chile vs Subsaharan African Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Subsaharan African
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Sub-Saharan Africans
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
89.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Subsaharan African Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,580,502 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.380 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,474,731 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 12.0%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 0.64% | 0.34% |
Maximum | 6.4% | 9.3% |
Range | 5.8% | 9.0% |
Mean | 2.1% | 2.6% |
Median | 1.9% | 2.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 2.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 0.74% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 1.6% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Sudanese (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Cameroon (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hungary (2.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Peru (2.1%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Scotland | 90.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 90.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 90.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.1% |
Sudanese | 89.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 89.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 88.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 88.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.1% |
New Zealanders | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.1% |
Syrians | 87.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.1% |
Venezuelans | 87.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.1% |
Vietnamese | 86.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Liberian (2.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Guatemalan (2.3%, a difference of 0.020%), French (2.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Bangladeshi (2.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and Alsatian (2.3%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Malaysians | 0.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Panama | 0.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 2.3% |
Alsatians | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 2.3% |
French | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 2.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 2.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% |
Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% |
Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% |
Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% |
Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |