Immigrants from Chile vs Subsaharan African Currently Married
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Subsaharan African
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Sub-Saharan Africans
46.4%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
36.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
186th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Subsaharan African Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,644,057 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.254 and weighted average of 46.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,112,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 42.6%, a difference of 9.0%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 27.8% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 73.4% | 84.5% |
Range | 45.6% | 82.7% |
Mean | 51.4% | 40.3% |
Median | 50.8% | 40.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 47.3% | 35.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 54.4% | 44.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 14.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 13.9% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Mongolian (46.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Peru (46.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Brazilian (46.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Potawatomi (46.5%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |
Immigrants | Chile | 36.8 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.4% |
Immigrants | Peru | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 46.4% |
Colombians | 31.8 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.3% |
Fijians | 30.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.3% |
Choctaw | 29.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 46.3% |
Immigrants | France | 27.7 /100 | #191 | Fair 46.2% |
Soviet Union | 25.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 46.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 25.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 46.2% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yuman (42.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (42.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 42.2% |