Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from El Salvador Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Immigrants from El Salvador
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Immigrants from El Salvador
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
89.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
21.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from El Salvador Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,580,502 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.380 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,605,888 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.502 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 5.6%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Immigrants from El Salvador |
Minimum | 0.64% | 0.21% |
Maximum | 6.4% | 4.1% |
Range | 5.8% | 3.9% |
Mean | 2.1% | 1.9% |
Median | 1.9% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 1.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 0.86% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 0.70% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 0.69% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Sudanese (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Cameroon (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hungary (2.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Peru (2.1%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Scotland | 90.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 90.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 90.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.1% |
Sudanese | 89.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 89.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 88.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 88.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.1% |
New Zealanders | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.1% |
Syrians | 87.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.1% |
Venezuelans | 87.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.1% |
Vietnamese | 86.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from El Salvador by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Czechoslovakian (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Ghanaian (2.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Thailand (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Grenada (2.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Slovak (2.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Europeans | 25.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.2% |
British | 25.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% |
Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 14.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.2% |