Croatian vs New Zealander Vision Disability
COMPARE
Croatian
New Zealander
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Croatians
New Zealanders
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
92.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
88.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Croatian vs New Zealander Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,377,812 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Croatians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.001 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,891,715 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 0.78%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Croatian | New Zealander |
Minimum | 0.57% | 0.22% |
Maximum | 10.2% | 6.6% |
Range | 9.6% | 6.4% |
Mean | 2.7% | 2.2% |
Median | 2.2% | 1.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 1.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 2.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.00% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Croatians and New Zealanders by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Immigrants from Vietnam (2.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Kenyan (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Ugandan (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Polish (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Philippines (2.1%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Hungary (2.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Cameroon (2.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Syrian (2.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Chile (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Kenyans | 92.5 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Croatians | 92.3 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Ugandans | 92.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Poles | 92.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 91.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 91.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 91.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 90.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 90.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 90.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.1% |
Sudanese | 89.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 89.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 88.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 88.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.1% |
New Zealanders | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.1% |
Syrians | 87.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.1% |