Croatian vs Immigrants from Uganda Vision Disability
COMPARE
Croatian
Immigrants from Uganda
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Croatians
Immigrants from Uganda
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
92.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
91.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Croatian vs Immigrants from Uganda Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,377,812 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Croatians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.001 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,949,603 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.216 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 0.21%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Croatian | Immigrants from Uganda |
Minimum | 0.57% | 0.52% |
Maximum | 10.2% | 5.8% |
Range | 9.6% | 5.3% |
Mean | 2.7% | 2.1% |
Median | 2.2% | 2.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 1.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 2.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.00% | 0.99% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 1.1% |
Demographics Similar to Croatians and Immigrants from Uganda by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Immigrants from Vietnam (2.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Kenyan (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Ugandan (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Polish (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Denmark (2.1%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Immigrants from Philippines (2.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (2.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Polish (2.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Ugandan (2.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (2.1%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Swedes | 94.2 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Danes | 94.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Koreans | 94.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Chileans | 94.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 93.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Peruvians | 93.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 92.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Kenyans | 92.5 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Croatians | 92.3 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Ugandans | 92.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Poles | 92.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 91.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 91.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 91.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 90.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 90.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 90.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.1% |