Burmese vs Thai Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Burmese
Thai
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Burmese
Thais
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Thai Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,101,003 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,631,146 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.324 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 7.3%.
![Burmese vs Thai Ambulatory Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/ambulatory-disability/burmese-vs-thais-ambulatory-disability-chart.webp)
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Burmese | Thai |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.18% |
Maximum | 23.5% | 8.6% |
Range | 22.5% | 8.4% |
Mean | 5.3% | 4.0% |
Median | 4.7% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 4.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Thais by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Okinawan (5.3%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Korea (5.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Immigrants from Taiwan (4.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Filipino (4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Singapore (5.0%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Bolivia (5.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and Bolivian (5.1%, a difference of 2.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |