Bolivian vs Thai Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Bolivian
Thai
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Bolivians
Thais
5.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Thai Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,650,218 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,631,146 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.324 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 2.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bolivian | Thai |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.18% |
Maximum | 13.1% | 8.6% |
Range | 12.0% | 8.4% |
Mean | 4.6% | 4.0% |
Median | 4.4% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.3% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 4.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Bolivians and Thais by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from Bolivia (5.0%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.99%), Immigrants from Singapore (5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), Iranian (5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and Yup'ik (5.2%, a difference of 2.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Immigrants from Taiwan (4.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Filipino (4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Singapore (5.0%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Bolivia (5.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and Immigrants from India (4.8%, a difference of 3.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |