Burmese vs Immigrants from Pakistan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Burmese
Immigrants from Pakistan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Burmese
Immigrants from Pakistan
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Immigrants from Pakistan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,101,003 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,855,056 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.327 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 3.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Burmese | Immigrants from Pakistan |
Minimum | 1.0% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 23.5% | 16.3% |
Range | 22.5% | 14.3% |
Mean | 5.3% | 5.8% |
Median | 4.7% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 6.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Immigrants from Pakistan by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Pakistan are Immigrants from Australia (5.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Venezuela (5.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Turkey (5.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Iran (5.4%, a difference of 0.92%), and Cambodian (5.4%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |