Burmese vs Okinawan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Burmese
Okinawan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Burmese
Okinawans
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Okinawan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,101,003 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,734,691 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Okinawans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.243 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 0.50%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Burmese | Okinawan |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 23.5% | 10.6% |
Range | 22.5% | 8.7% |
Mean | 5.3% | 4.9% |
Median | 4.7% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 5.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Okinawans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Korea (5.2%, a difference of 0.81%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Okinawans are Immigrants from Korea (5.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 0.98%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |