British vs Vietnamese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
British
Vietnamese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
British
Vietnamese
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
34.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
188th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
47.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Vietnamese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,154,282 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,721,676 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Vietnamese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 0.71%.
![British vs Vietnamese Ambulatory Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/ambulatory-disability/british-vs-vietnamese-ambulatory-disability-chart.webp)
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | British | Vietnamese |
Minimum | 0.87% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 10.1% |
Range | 99.1% | 9.0% |
Mean | 13.1% | 5.8% |
Median | 8.6% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 6.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.6% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.5% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to British and Vietnamese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to British are Ukrainian (6.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Africa (6.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Carpatho Rusyn (6.2%, a difference of 0.060%), European (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Vietnamese are Immigrants from North America (6.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from England (6.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Scandinavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Canada (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |