British vs Immigrants from England Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
British
Immigrants from England
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
British
Immigrants from England
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
34.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
188th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
45.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
177th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Immigrants from England Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,154,282 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,842,020 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.950 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 0.62%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | British | Immigrants from England |
Minimum | 0.87% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 75.4% |
Range | 99.1% | 73.1% |
Mean | 13.1% | 13.3% |
Median | 8.6% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 16.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.6% | 14.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.5% | 13.9% |
Demographics Similar to British and Immigrants from England by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to British are Ukrainian (6.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Africa (6.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Carpatho Rusyn (6.2%, a difference of 0.060%), European (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Immigrants from North America (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Scandinavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Vietnamese (6.1%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |