British vs Slovene Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
British
Slovene
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
British
Slovenes
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
34.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
188th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
18.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Slovene Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,154,282 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,334,117 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.390 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | British | Slovene |
Minimum | 0.87% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 23.0% |
Range | 99.1% | 20.4% |
Mean | 13.1% | 7.3% |
Median | 8.6% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 8.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.6% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.5% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to British and Slovenes by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to British are Ukrainian (6.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Africa (6.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Carpatho Rusyn (6.2%, a difference of 0.060%), European (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are Immigrants from Congo (6.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ukraine (6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Finnish (6.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Albanian (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Central America (6.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |