Guamanian/Chamorro vs Slovene Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Guamanian/Chamorro
Slovene
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Guamanians/Chamorros
Slovenes
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
10.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
18.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Slovene Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,865,083 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.111 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,334,117 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.390 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 0.81%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guamanian/Chamorro | Slovene |
Minimum | 2.8% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 17.3% | 23.0% |
Range | 14.4% | 20.4% |
Mean | 7.3% | 7.3% |
Median | 6.3% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 8.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros and Slovenes by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Yugoslavian (6.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are Immigrants from Congo (6.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ukraine (6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Finnish (6.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Albanian (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Central America (6.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% |