Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Los Angeles, CA

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Local Government Employees
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Los Angeles
States
California Cities
AlamedaAlhambraAnaheimAntiochApple ValleyArcadiaAuburnBakersfieldBerkeleyBeverly HillsBreaBuena ParkBurbankCamarilloCanoga ParkCanyon CountryCarlsbadCarsonCastro ValleyChicoChinoChula VistaCitrus HeightsClovisComptonConcordCoronaCosta MesaCovinaCulver CityDaly CityDanvilleDavisDesert Hot SpringsDowneyDuarteEdwardsEl CajonEl MonteElk GroveEncinoEscondidoEurekaFairfieldFontanaFremontFresnoFullertonGarden GroveGardenaGlendaleGlendoraGrass ValleyHaywardHemetHesperiaHuntington BeachIndioInglewoodIrvineLa JollaLa MesaLa MiradaLa PuenteLake ElsinoreLakewoodLancasterLivermoreLodiLoma LindaLompocLong BeachLos AltosLos AngelesLos GatosMaderaMalibuMantecaMenifeeMercedMission ViejoModestoMonterey ParkMoragaMoreno ValleyMountain ViewMurrietaNapaNewport BeachNorth HollywoodNorthridgeNovatoOaklandOceansideOntarioOrangeOrovilleOxnardPalm DesertPalm SpringsPalmdalePalo AltoPasadenaPerrisPetalumaPleasantonPomonaPortervilleRancho CordovaRancho CucamongaRancho Santa FeReddingRedlandsRedondo BeachRedwood CityRialtoRichmondRiversideRocklinRosevilleSacramentoSalinasSan BernardinoSan ClementeSan DiegoSan FranciscoSan GabrielSan JacintoSan JoseSan LeandroSan Luis ObispoSan MarcosSan MateoSan PedroSan RafaelSan RamonSanta AnaSanta BarbaraSanta ClaraSanta ClaritaSanta CruzSanta MariaSanta MonicaSanta RosaSherman OaksSimi ValleySpring ValleyStocktonSunnyvaleTemeculaThousand OaksTorranceTrabuco CanyonTracyTurlockTustinUplandVacavilleValenciaVallejoVan NuysVenturaVictorvilleVisaliaVistaWalnut CreekWest CovinaWest SacramentoWhittierWoodlandWoodland HillsYorba LindaYuba City
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Los Angeles

0.0%
15.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Los Angeles Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Los Angeles, CA

Zip Code % Local Government Employees vs State vs National
1.9005615.0%8.1%(+6.89)#1447.2%(+7.73)#2,962
2.9000813.6%8.1%(+5.54)#2007.2%(+6.39)#3,820
3.9003213.1%8.1%(+4.99)#2317.2%(+5.83)#4,249
4.9004313.0%8.1%(+4.90)#2337.2%(+5.74)#4,331
5.9004013.0%8.1%(+4.88)#2347.2%(+5.72)#4,347
6.9004711.9%8.1%(+3.79)#3097.2%(+4.63)#5,472
7.9003110.5%8.1%(+2.38)#4587.2%(+3.22)#7,490
8.9004110.3%8.1%(+2.21)#4837.2%(+3.06)#7,818
9.900659.3%8.1%(+1.26)#6127.2%(+2.10)#9,734
10.900638.8%8.1%(+0.727)#6917.2%(+1.57)#11,038
11.900228.6%8.1%(+0.551)#7207.2%(+1.40)#11,457
12.900628.4%8.1%(+0.340)#7647.2%(+1.18)#12,027
13.900427.9%8.1%(-0.202)#8587.2%(+0.642)#13,567
14.900237.6%8.1%(-0.500)#9087.2%(+0.344)#14,530
15.900447.5%8.1%(-0.553)#9177.2%(+0.292)#14,705
16.900167.4%8.1%(-0.717)#9517.2%(+0.127)#15,210
17.900397.3%8.1%(-0.768)#9617.2%(+0.077)#15,374
18.900617.0%8.1%(-1.03)#1,0077.2%(-0.190)#16,230
19.900587.0%8.1%(-1.04)#1,0087.2%(-0.194)#16,245
20.900596.9%8.1%(-1.20)#1,0337.2%(-0.357)#16,813
21.900336.6%8.1%(-1.45)#1,0817.2%(-0.609)#17,678
22.900186.5%8.1%(-1.57)#1,1087.2%(-0.728)#18,126
23.900296.3%8.1%(-1.74)#1,1287.2%(-0.895)#18,683
24.900126.3%8.1%(-1.81)#1,1387.2%(-0.965)#18,905
25.900196.2%8.1%(-1.88)#1,1507.2%(-1.04)#19,169
26.900025.9%8.1%(-2.15)#1,1927.2%(-1.31)#20,047
27.900355.8%8.1%(-2.27)#1,2157.2%(-1.43)#20,468
28.900075.6%8.1%(-2.46)#1,2447.2%(-1.62)#21,099
29.900035.2%8.1%(-2.84)#1,2967.2%(-1.99)#22,316
30.900265.2%8.1%(-2.84)#1,2977.2%(-2.00)#22,345
31.900215.2%8.1%(-2.88)#1,3017.2%(-2.03)#22,446
32.900385.2%8.1%(-2.90)#1,3067.2%(-2.05)#22,508
33.900345.1%8.1%(-2.93)#1,3097.2%(-2.09)#22,621
34.900375.1%8.1%(-2.98)#1,3157.2%(-2.14)#22,769
35.900135.1%8.1%(-3.00)#1,3167.2%(-2.16)#22,826
36.900015.1%8.1%(-3.02)#1,3197.2%(-2.18)#22,872
37.900665.0%8.1%(-3.05)#1,3267.2%(-2.21)#22,992
38.900454.8%8.1%(-3.25)#1,3537.2%(-2.40)#23,550
39.900114.7%8.1%(-3.37)#1,3637.2%(-2.53)#23,875
40.900574.5%8.1%(-3.56)#1,3807.2%(-2.72)#24,398
41.900174.3%8.1%(-3.75)#1,3957.2%(-2.91)#24,915
42.900274.2%8.1%(-3.85)#1,4047.2%(-3.01)#25,172
43.900253.7%8.1%(-4.40)#1,4497.2%(-3.55)#26,396
44.900143.5%8.1%(-4.58)#1,4587.2%(-3.73)#26,712
45.900043.5%8.1%(-4.58)#1,4597.2%(-3.74)#26,719
46.900203.5%8.1%(-4.59)#1,4617.2%(-3.75)#26,743
47.900243.5%8.1%(-4.61)#1,4627.2%(-3.77)#26,787
48.900053.4%8.1%(-4.67)#1,4667.2%(-3.83)#26,895
49.900643.4%8.1%(-4.69)#1,4687.2%(-3.85)#26,941
50.900283.3%8.1%(-4.79)#1,4777.2%(-3.95)#27,106
51.900063.3%8.1%(-4.80)#1,4787.2%(-3.96)#27,119
52.900463.1%8.1%(-4.92)#1,4857.2%(-4.08)#27,312
53.900152.9%8.1%(-5.19)#1,5017.2%(-4.34)#27,723
54.900362.7%8.1%(-5.38)#1,5117.2%(-4.54)#27,960
55.900102.6%8.1%(-5.49)#1,5187.2%(-4.65)#28,101
56.900682.2%8.1%(-5.89)#1,5357.2%(-5.04)#28,539
57.900491.7%8.1%(-6.35)#1,5517.2%(-5.51)#28,924
58.900481.7%8.1%(-6.41)#1,5537.2%(-5.57)#28,973
59.900771.3%8.1%(-6.75)#1,5657.2%(-5.91)#29,251

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Los Angeles, CA?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Los Angeles, CA are:
#1
15.0%
#2
13.6%
#3
13.1%
#4
13.0%
#5
13.0%
#6
11.9%
#7
10.5%
#8
10.3%
#9
9.3%
#10
8.8%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Los Angeles, CA?
90056 has the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Los Angeles, CA with 15.0%.
What is the Percentage of Local Government Employees in Los Angeles, CA?
Percentage of Local Government Employees in Los Angeles is 5.9%.
What is the Percentage of Local Government Employees in California?
Percentage of Local Government Employees in California is 8.1%.
What is the Percentage of Local Government Employees in the United States?
Percentage of Local Government Employees in the United States is 7.2%.