Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Los Angeles
States
California Cities
AlamedaAlhambraAnaheimAntiochApple ValleyArcadiaAuburnBakersfieldBerkeleyBeverly HillsBreaBuena ParkBurbankCamarilloCanoga ParkCanyon CountryCarlsbadCarsonCastro ValleyChicoChinoChula VistaCitrus HeightsClovisComptonConcordCoronaCosta MesaCovinaCulver CityDaly CityDanvilleDavisDesert Hot SpringsDowneyDuarteEl CajonEl MonteElk GroveEncinoEscondidoEurekaFairfieldFontanaFremontFresnoFullertonGarden GroveGardenaGlendaleGlendoraGrass ValleyHaywardHemetHesperiaHuntington BeachIndioInglewoodIrvineLa MesaLa PuenteLake ElsinoreLakewoodLancasterLivermoreLodiLoma LindaLompocLong BeachLos AltosLos AngelesLos GatosMaderaMantecaMenifeeMercedMission ViejoModestoMontereyMonterey ParkMoreno ValleyMountain ViewMurrietaNapaNewport BeachNorth HollywoodNorthridgeNovatoOaklandOceansideOntarioOrangeOrovilleOxnardPalm DesertPalm SpringsPalmdalePalo AltoPasadenaPerrisPetalumaPleasantonPomonaPortervilleRancho CordovaRancho CucamongaRancho Santa FeReddingRedlandsRedondo BeachRedwood CityRialtoRichmondRiversideRocklinRosevilleSacramentoSalinasSan BernardinoSan ClementeSan DiegoSan FranciscoSan GabrielSan JacintoSan JoseSan LeandroSan Luis ObispoSan MarcosSan MateoSan PedroSan RafaelSan RamonSanta AnaSanta BarbaraSanta ClaraSanta ClaritaSanta CruzSanta MariaSanta MonicaSanta RosaSherman OaksSimi ValleySpring ValleyStocktonSunnyvaleTemeculaThousand OaksTorranceTrabuco CanyonTracyTurlockTustinUplandVacavilleValenciaVallejoVan NuysVenturaVictorvilleVisaliaVistaWalnut CreekWest CovinaWest SacramentoWhittierWoodlandWoodland HillsYorba LindaYuba City
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles

0.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA

Zip Code % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1.90089100.0%44.4%(+55.6)#435.2%(+64.8)#35
2.9005797.0%44.4%(+52.6)#3135.2%(+61.8)#356
3.9001496.5%44.4%(+52.2)#3235.2%(+61.3)#365
4.9002896.0%44.4%(+51.6)#3435.2%(+60.8)#373
5.9001794.6%44.4%(+50.2)#3535.2%(+59.4)#387
6.9001293.6%44.4%(+49.2)#3835.2%(+58.4)#401
7.9002193.1%44.4%(+48.8)#3935.2%(+58.0)#407
8.9000592.2%44.4%(+47.8)#4135.2%(+57.0)#423
9.9003892.1%44.4%(+47.7)#4235.2%(+56.9)#425
10.9001392.0%44.4%(+47.6)#4335.2%(+56.8)#426
11.9001591.4%44.4%(+47.0)#4535.2%(+56.2)#437
12.9002090.6%44.4%(+46.2)#4735.2%(+55.4)#453
13.9000789.4%44.4%(+45.0)#5435.2%(+54.2)#482
14.9000689.4%44.4%(+45.0)#5535.2%(+54.2)#483
15.9002988.4%44.4%(+44.1)#5735.2%(+53.2)#505
16.9005886.7%44.4%(+42.3)#6035.2%(+51.5)#525
17.9003685.2%44.4%(+40.9)#6235.2%(+50.1)#550
18.9000483.5%44.4%(+39.2)#6935.2%(+48.4)#587
19.9001083.5%44.4%(+39.1)#7035.2%(+48.3)#592
20.9003380.3%44.4%(+35.9)#8335.2%(+45.1)#666
21.9003479.7%44.4%(+35.3)#8535.2%(+44.5)#681
22.9002779.1%44.4%(+34.7)#9035.2%(+43.9)#699
23.9004678.4%44.4%(+34.1)#9535.2%(+43.3)#724
24.9002676.3%44.4%(+31.9)#10535.2%(+41.1)#792
25.9002575.3%44.4%(+30.9)#11135.2%(+40.1)#825
26.9001975.0%44.4%(+30.6)#11435.2%(+39.8)#839
27.9003774.9%44.4%(+30.5)#11635.2%(+39.7)#843
28.9002373.7%44.4%(+29.3)#12235.2%(+38.5)#882
29.9001173.3%44.4%(+28.9)#12435.2%(+38.1)#899
30.9000373.0%44.4%(+28.6)#12635.2%(+37.8)#915
31.9004871.1%44.4%(+26.7)#13935.2%(+35.9)#1,006
32.9004469.6%44.4%(+25.2)#15635.2%(+34.4)#1,082
33.9000868.5%44.4%(+24.1)#16335.2%(+33.3)#1,144
34.9003568.0%44.4%(+23.6)#17035.2%(+32.8)#1,182
35.9003167.2%44.4%(+22.8)#17935.2%(+32.0)#1,228
36.9001867.1%44.4%(+22.8)#18135.2%(+32.0)#1,231
37.9002466.7%44.4%(+22.4)#18335.2%(+31.6)#1,249
38.9002265.3%44.4%(+21.0)#20535.2%(+30.2)#1,358
39.9000165.2%44.4%(+20.8)#20735.2%(+30.0)#1,370
40.9001663.6%44.4%(+19.2)#22935.2%(+28.4)#1,498
41.9006663.3%44.4%(+18.9)#23635.2%(+28.1)#1,531
42.9006362.8%44.4%(+18.5)#24035.2%(+27.7)#1,564
43.9006159.6%44.4%(+15.3)#28835.2%(+24.5)#1,838
44.9000259.2%44.4%(+14.8)#29535.2%(+24.0)#1,883
45.9004255.0%44.4%(+10.6)#36535.2%(+19.8)#2,340
46.9005953.7%44.4%(+9.28)#39235.2%(+18.5)#2,518
47.9006853.6%44.4%(+9.23)#39435.2%(+18.4)#2,528
48.9003953.0%44.4%(+8.65)#40535.2%(+17.8)#2,615
49.9006252.8%44.4%(+8.45)#41035.2%(+17.6)#2,650
50.9006552.4%44.4%(+8.07)#41535.2%(+17.3)#2,709
51.9004552.1%44.4%(+7.71)#42135.2%(+16.9)#2,754
52.9006447.9%44.4%(+3.55)#51035.2%(+12.7)#3,461
53.9004147.8%44.4%(+3.48)#51135.2%(+12.7)#3,476
54.9004346.9%44.4%(+2.55)#54135.2%(+11.7)#3,652
55.9004046.6%44.4%(+2.21)#55035.2%(+11.4)#3,710
56.9004746.0%44.4%(+1.62)#57135.2%(+10.8)#3,844
57.9003246.0%44.4%(+1.60)#57335.2%(+10.8)#3,851
58.9004945.6%44.4%(+1.19)#58135.2%(+10.4)#3,931
59.9005642.2%44.4%(-2.18)#67835.2%(+7.01)#4,783
60.9006734.8%44.4%(-9.53)#92735.2%(-0.338)#7,430
61.9007714.7%44.4%(-29.7)#1,54235.2%(-20.5)#23,421

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA are:
#1
100.0%
#2
97.0%
#3
96.5%
#4
96.0%
#5
94.6%
#6
93.6%
#7
93.1%
#8
92.2%
#9
92.1%
#10
92.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA?
90089 has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles is 63.4%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in California?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in California is 44.4%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.