Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Fort Lauderdale, FL

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Owner-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCanadianCape VerdeanCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCanadianCape VerdeanCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Fort Lauderdale
States
Florida Cities
Altamonte SpringsApopkaArcadiaBoca RatonBonita SpringsBoynton BeachBradentonBrandonBrooksvilleCape CoralCasselberryClearwaterClermontCocoaCoral SpringsCrestviewCrystal RiverDade CityDavenportDaytona BeachDeerfield BeachDefuniak SpringsDelandDelray BeachDeltonaDunnellonEdgewaterEnglewoodEustisFort LauderdaleFort MyersFort PierceFort Walton BeachGainesvilleGulf BreezeHialeahHolidayHollywoodHomesteadHomosassaHudsonInvernessJacksonvilleJupiterKissimmeeLake CityLake WalesLake WorthLakelandLand O LakesLargoLeesburgLehigh AcresLive OakLongwoodLutzMariannaMelbourneMerritt IslandMiamiMiami BeachMiltonNaplesNew Port RicheyNew Smyrna BeachNorth Fort MyersNorth PortOcalaOkeechobeeOpa LockaOrange ParkOrlandoOrmond BeachOviedoPalm BayPalm Beach GardensPalm CoastPalm HarborPanama CityPanama City BeachPensacolaPerryPinellas ParkPlant CityPompano BeachPort CharlottePort OrangePort Saint LuciePunta GordaQuincyRiverviewSaint AugustineSaint CloudSaint PetersburgSanfordSarasotaSebastianSebringSeminoleSpring HillStuartTallahasseeTampaTarpon SpringsThe VillagesTitusvilleValricoVeniceVero BeachWesley ChapelWest Palm BeachWewahitchkaWinter HavenWinter ParkZephyrhills
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Fort Lauderdale

35.2%
94.9%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Fort Lauderdale Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Fort Lauderdale, FL

Zip Code % Owner-Occupied vs State vs National
1. 33330 94.9% 66.9% (+28.0)#42 64.8% (+30.1)#2,780
2. 33332 87.2% 66.9% (+20.4)#134 64.8% (+22.4)#7,669
3. 33331 84.9% 66.9% (+18.0)#196 64.8% (+20.1)#9,784
4. 33322 82.4% 66.9% (+15.6)#270 64.8% (+17.6)#12,237
5. 33328 80.5% 66.9% (+13.6)#323 64.8% (+15.7)#14,166
6. 33327 77.6% 66.9% (+10.7)#412 64.8% (+12.8)#16,861
7. 33325 76.1% 66.9% (+9.23)#449 64.8% (+11.3)#18,224
8. 33317 74.9% 66.9% (+8.03)#486 64.8% (+10.1)#19,277
9. 33321 74.4% 66.9% (+7.52)#496 64.8% (+9.57)#19,687
10. 33323 73.1% 66.9% (+6.26)#519 64.8% (+8.32)#20,627
11. 33306 72.1% 66.9% (+5.20)#541 64.8% (+7.25)#21,365
12. 33326 70.3% 66.9% (+3.40)#580 64.8% (+5.45)#22,567
13. 33308 68.9% 66.9% (+2.06)#600 64.8% (+4.11)#23,427
14. 33305 68.8% 66.9% (+1.89)#604 64.8% (+3.95)#23,517
15. 33319 65.6% 66.9% (-1.27)#650 64.8% (+0.785)#25,154
16. 33312 62.8% 66.9% (-4.07)#696 64.8% (-2.01)#26,426
17. 33351 57.8% 66.9% (-9.05)#765 64.8% (-6.99)#28,030
18. 33316 57.0% 66.9% (-9.85)#773 64.8% (-7.80)#28,241
19. 33309 56.8% 66.9% (-10.1)#776 64.8% (-8.04)#28,296
20. 33334 56.6% 66.9% (-10.2)#781 64.8% (-8.20)#28,348
21. 33324 56.5% 66.9% (-10.4)#783 64.8% (-8.34)#28,380
22. 33315 55.6% 66.9% (-11.3)#796 64.8% (-9.24)#28,608
23. 33311 46.1% 66.9% (-20.7)#881 64.8% (-18.7)#30,326
24. 33313 42.8% 66.9% (-24.1)#900 64.8% (-22.0)#30,743
25. 33304 40.9% 66.9% (-26.0)#910 64.8% (-24.0)#30,933
26. 33301 37.7% 66.9% (-29.1)#921 64.8% (-27.1)#31,208
27. 33314 35.2% 66.9% (-31.7)#929 64.8% (-29.7)#31,429

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Fort Lauderdale, FL?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Fort Lauderdale, FL are:
#1
94.9%
#2
87.2%
#3
84.9%
#4
82.4%
#5
80.5%
#6
77.6%
#7
76.1%
#8
74.9%
#9
74.4%
#10
73.1%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Fort Lauderdale, FL?
33330 has the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Fort Lauderdale, FL with 94.9%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Fort Lauderdale, FL?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Fort Lauderdale is 54.2%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Florida?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Florida is 66.9%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States is 64.8%.