West Indian vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Unemployment
COMPARE
West Indian
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
West Indians
Immigrants from Oceania
6.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
297th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
79.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
West Indian vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,607,291 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of West Indians and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.346 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,351,716 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.803 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 18.9%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | West Indian | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 8.3% | 29.1% |
| Range | 7.3% | 27.9% |
| Mean | 5.6% | 7.9% |
| Median | 5.9% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 5.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to West Indians by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to West Indians are Alaskan Athabascan (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Jamaican (6.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from El Salvador (6.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ute (6.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.1% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 6.2% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
| Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
| Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |