Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Immigrants from Oceania
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
20.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
79.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,480,571 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.136 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,351,716 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.803 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 4.1%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 0.60% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 13.8% | 29.1% |
Range | 13.2% | 27.9% |
Mean | 5.6% | 7.9% |
Median | 5.4% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 8.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 5.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Iroquois (5.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Soviet Union (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Hawaiian (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Colombians | 27.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 26.2 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.3% |
Spaniards | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.3% |
Alsatians | 23.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.3% |
Tsimshian | 23.1 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
Hawaiians | 22.2 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
Soviet Union | 21.7 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 20.8 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
Iroquois | 20.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 20.3 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 19.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 18.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Creek | 15.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 13.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |