Zimbabwean vs South American Indian Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
South American Indian
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
South American Indians
15.6%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
96.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs South American Indian Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,763,564 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.554 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,417,675 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.272 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 0.83%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | South American Indian |
| Minimum | 4.8% | 8.2% |
| Maximum | 58.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 53.8% | 91.8% |
| Mean | 16.8% | 25.0% |
| Median | 15.3% | 15.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.3% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.7% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.0% | 22.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.7% | 22.2% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and South American Indians by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Yaqui (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Belgium (15.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (15.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Uruguay (15.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Basque (15.5%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Australian (15.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Australia (15.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Chilean (15.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Poland (15.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and Native Hawaiian (15.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Mexican American Indians | 98.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.6 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.5 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Basques | 98.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 98.2 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 98.1 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 15.6% |
| Yaqui | 98.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 15.6% |
| Zimbabweans | 98.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 97.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 96.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Fijians | 96.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Chileans | 96.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| South American Indians | 96.2 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Australians | 96.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 96.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Pakistanis | 95.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Turks | 95.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 95.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.8% |