White/Caucasian vs Scotch-Irish Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Scotch-Irish
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Scotch-Irish
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs Scotch-Irish Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,395,051 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.494 and weighted average of 22.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,342,644 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.629 and weighted average of 22.9%, a difference of 1.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | White/Caucasian | Scotch-Irish |
| Minimum | 18.3% | 8.1% |
| Maximum | 38.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 20.0% | 91.9% |
| Mean | 24.3% | 41.2% |
| Median | 24.0% | 36.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.6% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.4% | 51.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 26.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 22.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 22.5% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians and Scotch-Irish by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Celtic (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Belize (22.6%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Immigrants from Laos (22.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Central American (23.0%, a difference of 0.24%), British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Micronesia (23.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |