Immigrants from Zaire vs Scotch-Irish Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zaire
Scotch-Irish
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zaire
Scotch-Irish
23.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
281st/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zaire vs Scotch-Irish Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,941,709 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.401 and weighted average of 23.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,342,644 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.629 and weighted average of 22.9%, a difference of 3.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zaire | Scotch-Irish |
Minimum | 7.5% | 8.1% |
Maximum | 33.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 25.9% | 91.9% |
Mean | 23.0% | 41.2% |
Median | 24.0% | 36.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.0% | 25.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.3% | 51.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 26.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 22.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 22.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zaire and Scotch-Irish by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zaire are Guatemalan (23.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.51%), Alaskan Athabascan (23.6%, a difference of 1.0%), Nonimmigrants (23.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and Pennsylvania German (23.6%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Immigrants from Laos (22.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Central American (23.0%, a difference of 0.24%), British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Micronesia (23.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |