Turkish vs Austrian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Austrian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Turks
Austrians
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Austrian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,658,978 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 451,657,404 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Austrians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.763 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 2.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Austrian |
| Minimum | 0.67% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 22.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 22.2% | 96.7% |
| Mean | 10.0% | 28.2% |
| Median | 9.8% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 31.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 21.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 28.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 28.5% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Austrians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Asian (11.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Romania (12.0%, a difference of 0.63%), Slovene (12.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (12.0%, a difference of 0.86%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Austrians are Indian (Asian) (12.2%, a difference of 0.010%), German (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Ukrainian (12.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Asia (12.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Austrians | 97.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 12.2% |