Tsimshian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Male Poverty
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Tsimshian
Immigrants from South Central Asia
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.3%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,624,889 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.352 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,354,703 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.620 and weighted average of 9.3%, a difference of 38.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tsimshian | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Minimum | 8.5% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 21.8% | 14.4% |
| Range | 13.2% | 14.0% |
| Mean | 13.7% | 6.6% |
| Median | 13.1% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.3% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Alaskan Athabascan (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Nepalese (12.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Sudanese (12.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (12.8%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| French American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 0.56%), Filipino (9.2%, a difference of 0.79%), Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |