Tsimshian vs Central American Indian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Central American Indian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Tsimshian
Central American Indians
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
75.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Central American Indian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.062 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,040,737 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.595 and weighted average of 18.0%, a difference of 37.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tsimshian | Central American Indian |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 27.8% | 94.5% |
| Range | 25.6% | 93.2% |
| Mean | 14.0% | 26.1% |
| Median | 13.1% | 20.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 14.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 37.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 23.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 17.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 17.3% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Yugoslavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Yakama (18.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Colville (17.8%, a difference of 1.5%), Immigrants from Honduras (17.7%, a difference of 1.7%), Paiute (17.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and Menominee (17.6%, a difference of 2.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |