Tlingit-Haida vs Pima Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Pima
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Pima
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
29.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Pima Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,443,448 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,443,182 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 29.7%, a difference of 94.4%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Pima |
Minimum | 0.92% | 10.7% |
Maximum | 37.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 36.9% | 89.3% |
Mean | 18.1% | 38.9% |
Median | 18.0% | 35.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 22.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.0% | 51.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.8% | 29.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 23.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 22.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Norway (15.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Czechoslovakian (15.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Scottish (15.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and South African (15.2%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 93.5 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Native Hawaiians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.2% |
South Africans | 93.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Scottish | 93.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Norway | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Tlingit-Haida | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 92.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Palestinians | 91.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Canadians | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Navajo (30.3%, a difference of 1.8%), Yuman (30.6%, a difference of 3.0%), Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 3.1%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and Lumbee (31.9%, a difference of 7.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.5% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 26.3% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.7% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 30.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.6% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.8% |