Alaskan Athabascan vs Pima Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Pima
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Pima
17.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
7.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
29.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Pima Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,576,006 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.518 and weighted average of 17.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,443,182 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 29.7%, a difference of 69.0%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Pima |
Minimum | 3.4% | 10.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 96.6% | 89.3% |
Mean | 37.8% | 38.9% |
Median | 24.1% | 35.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.0% | 22.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 63.6% | 51.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 48.6% | 29.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 29.5% | 23.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 29.2% | 22.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Malaysian (17.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Armenia (17.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants (17.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Aleut (17.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Thailand (17.5%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 13.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 13.3 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.3% |
Ugandans | 12.5 /100 | #204 | Poor 17.3% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 11.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 17.4% |
German Russians | 10.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 8.2 /100 | #207 | Tragic 17.5% |
Malaysians | 7.6 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 7.3 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 6.8 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 6.7 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.6% |
Aleuts | 6.6 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.7% |
Panamanians | 5.9 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.7% |
Osage | 5.8 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.7% |
Moroccans | 5.6 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.7% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Navajo (30.3%, a difference of 1.8%), Yuman (30.6%, a difference of 3.0%), Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 3.1%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and Lumbee (31.9%, a difference of 7.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.5% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 26.3% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.7% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 30.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.6% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.8% |